Sunday, September 21, 2014

Hindu Reformers Ushered In Societal Reforms Without Creating Bad Blood.

On the 152 birth anniversary of a south Indian social reformer Ayyankaly[क], PM Narendra Modi gave out a secret behind uninterrupted continuation of Sanskriti which has stood firm for several thousands of years in a world that has witnessed death of rest of the civilizations. Among many, one of the reasons behind continuity of the Sanskriti, he said, was a continued flow of Hindu reformers throughout all the ages. It is not to say that in Hinduism the reformers were welcomed with open arms by the high and mighty of the society or that they did not face resistance. They did face opposition but unlike other societies of the world, Hinduism reacted differently. Here, both sides, the society’s high and mighty and the rebels, both, behaved in ways far different than the normal reaction we are accustomed to see elsewhere in the world.

Mahatama Ayyankaly faught against the discrimination his society was subjected to owing to their ‘lower’ caste status. He rebelled against demeaning traditions and life that denied self-esteem.

The oppressed are easy prey to the sense of victimhood and revenge. But in India, they resisted the easy option and even in asking for justice, even in fighting, they remained clear in their objective that the fight was not with people but with the ideas that cause injustice. Therefore even in the thick of the fight they did not make the higher castes as their enemies. This is unique. They did not seek revenge in tit-for-tat style which is common knee-jerk reaction. They sought justice based on Hinduism’s idea of seeing God in every individual. Remember, Mahatma Gandhi called lower castes as ‘Hari-Jan’ meaning, ‘Godly people’ or ‘People of God’. Reformer saint-poet Narsinh Mehta, too called them similarly using different word ‘Vaishnav-Jan’.

The oppressor does not like to give up authority. He will harbor ill-will towards the beneficiaries of reforms. He would never like to be penalized for generations for the discrimination his ancestors may or may not have committed towards ‘oppressed’. However in India, the ‘oppressor’ higher caste Hindus have agreed to a constitution that is heavily against them. It prevents them from jobs and school admissions even if they are pre-eminently qualified. Higher caste Hindus, do not see this as ‘punishment’ but as a necessary sacrifice for betterment of deprived ‘lower-caste’, thus not breeding any jealousy or animosity towards beneficiaries of the positive-discrimination.

Hindus are blessed by three factors. One, arrival of bold reformers within the faith at regular intervals, two, their quality and third, their technic. The ‘Oppressor’ and ‘oppressed’ were inspired by the Hindu ideal of seeking own evolution into higher-self. Therefore, the seekers of justice came from both the divide. The reformers sprang not only from ‘oppressed’ but also from the ‘oppressor’ class. They came from ‘higher castes’ as well as from ‘lower’ castes. In their fight, they never made enemies in the opposite camp. Even in their fiercest resistance, Hindu reformers fought in a responsible manner; they never incited the ‘oppressed’ to seek blood. And under severest criticism, Hindu Shankaracharyas and other Acharyas did not pass any death sentences, fatwas or imprisonments for Hindu equivalents of Copernicuses, and Ibn Sinas. Hindu equivalents of ‘Protestants’, ‘Shias’, ‘Esmailies’ and ‘bourgeois’ and ‘proletariats’ never did face massacre, guillotine, burning at stake, or confiscation of properties.

Reformers, social and religious, in the territories west of India, branded those who opposed them, variously as heretics, heathens, idolaters, murtadad, kafir, reactionary, bourgeois etc. Fear of holding contrarian opinion meant severe punishments. That fear prevented many would be reformers from reforming their societies. As freedom of thought is a cornerstone of Hinduism, reformers could continuously help shape Hindu societies whenever need arose. Hindus have realized since ancient times that the change is the only constant in the universe. Everything is in constant state of change. Change is a universal law. Without reforms, the society suffers agonies of traditions and rituals that are irrelevant to the current era. Every society need reformers. However, they are hard to come by under the threats of being branded heretic or apostate. Reformers need to be bold. In Hinduism, they have empowered oppressed, have restored their place in the society without ever making them rivals and enemies. And in long Hindu history, they are never sought to be obliterated, white-washed, purged or their work impugned.


[क] On 8 Sept, 2014.  http://www.narendramodi.in/pm-attends-152nd-birth-anniversary-celebrations-of-mahatma-ayyankali-at-delhi/
 

Thursday, September 4, 2014

Emperor, What Gift Did He Accept? Not Bhagavad Gita? (A parody, an imaginary story)



Indian Prime Minister was visiting an important country. This time around he made sure that the leaders of opposition parties in India should not be offended by improper choice of gift. He knew that he had made a blunder last time when he had gone ahead on his own impulse and thoughtlessly gifted the holy book of Hindus, the Bhagavad Gita to the Emperor of Japan in early September 2014.  Some opposition leaders thought that it was a partisan attempt at glorifying Hinduism, ‘He should not forget that India has a large population of Muslims and Christians and therefore he should not forget other holy books, the holy Koran and the holy Bible’. Therefore, to please everyone, this time around the PM takes all the three holy books on this trip.
Three books were individually gift wrapped, one in golden, and other in silver and third in an orange wrapping paper. During his meeting with the Monarch, Indian PM rises to give him those gift that he had thoughtfully carried with him from India. The Monarch who was hosting the welcome for him, also rose to receive the gift, however, when he saw three big parcels, he paused and said, ‘Mr. PM, this is too much of gifts, I will take only one of them, please tell me what is in each parcel and I will choose what appeals me most’.
 



 
It is not polite to argue with host emperor and as the Indian PM was knowledgeable, he was sure that he would convince the emperor to accept all three. PM started with the most expensive looking Golden parcel. He said, this is a holy book of the largest number of people in the world. Then he pointed at silver parcel and said that this too is a holy book and is also followed by a very large number of people, ranking second in the number of its followers in the world and he said this orange parcel too is considered holy by a very large number of people, ranking third number in the world.
The emperor looked puzzled, he said, why do you talk about the world? Are you not an Indian PM? I would prefer that book which has Indian flavor, is either written in India or written by someone who is native of India or the one which has maximum followers in India. Tell me which that is. The book in orange wrapper was the Bhagavad Gita and it met all the criteria, it was written in Kurukshetra (in India), it was authored by a person born in Mathura (in India) and it is followed by largest number of people in India. Although PM knew that the orange parcel fulfilled all the three critical criteria, he was worried, if he was to only give one holy book, opposition political leaders of India would be angry and tear him apart in TV debates and in parliament upon his return from trip. He cannot give up, he must convince the Emperor for all the three.
Indian PM, therefore persists, ‘your Highness, this orange parcel has the holy book of Hindus, the Bhagavad Gita, it fulfills your idea of a good gift with the flavor of India but rest of the books too have very large number of followers in India, albeit those books are neither written in India nor written by Indians. Emperor did not take even a moment to respond, he instantly told, I am sure, other two books are holy Koran and holy Bible. If so, please leave it to someone from Mecca, Jerusalem or Rome to gift those to me. It is their gift to the world and the Bhagavad Gita is India’s gift to the world.
Indian PM knew, the host was right but he had worries about the left ‘thinkers’ of India. Indian PM returned  with two books, still in the wrapping paper and as predicted, many Christian leaders, Muslim leaders and the left leaning socialists and communists were not happy. Surprisingly, some one was happy and said “thank you”.



));